Have A Case? Call Us
1 888-536-6671
60 Second Lemon Law Assessment™
60 Second Lemon Law Assessment™
If you’re fed up with repeated trips to the repair shop for the same problems, you may be driving a lemon—and you may have legal rights. The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq.) is the primary federal statute protecting consumers against defective products. Unlike state laws that often expire within 12–24 months, the federal act generally covers any vehicle for the duration of its manufacturer’s warranty. This is often paired with the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), specifically the “Implied Warranty of Merchantability,” which provides a legal basis for a refund if a car is not fit for its ordinary purpose. To see how these rules vary by state, you can review our Lemon Law Florida requirements guide. At Kahn & Associates, we’ve been helping drivers across the country get compensation, refunds, and replacement vehicles for nearly three decades. Even if your vehicle doesn’t meet the exact criteria of a state lemon law, you may still qualify under federal warranty laws and other legal protections. Don’t let ongoing repairs cost you time, money, and peace of mind. Let us fight to get you the justice and relief you deserve.
If you’ve purchased or leased a vehicle with a warranty—whether new or used—you may be protected by the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, a federal law that holds manufacturers accountable for defective products. This law:
In addition, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) offers breach of warranty protections when a manufacturer fails to honor the terms of its warranty—whether the issue affects performance, safety, or reliability. These laws work together to give you strong legal tools—even if your vehicle doesn’t qualify under your state’s lemon law. That’s where our experience matters. With decades of warranty litigation behind us, we know how to navigate this complex legal web and fight for the maximum compensation you deserve. No cost to you. No office visit needed. Let us evaluate your case today.
One of the most significant advantages of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act is its “fee-shifting” provision. This federal mandate requires the manufacturer to pay all of your reasonable attorney’s fees and court costs if you prevail in your claim. This levels the playing field, allowing an individual consumer to go head-to-head with multi-billion-dollar automakers without financial risk.
Furthermore, the federal statute allows for “Cash and Keep” settlements. In many instances, the manufacturer may offer a significant cash payment for the diminished value of the vehicle while allowing you to keep the car and continue using its remaining warranty. This is often a faster resolution than a full repurchase and provides immediate financial relief for the “sour” experience of owning a defective vehicle.
To qualify under the Federal Lemon Law or UCC protections, your vehicle must generally meet these criteria:
Unlike many state lemon laws, federal protections apply regardless of mileage or age, so long as the warranty was in effect at the time of the repairs. Not sure if your situation qualifies? Let us evaluate it for free.
If you qualify under the Federal Lemon Law or these other legal protections, you may be entitled to:
We’ve recovered millions of dollars for consumers across the U.S. by leveraging every available law to maximize results—even when their cases didn’t qualify under a state lemon law alone. If you’re having repeated problems with your vehicle, don’t guess. Let us review your case for free—and fight to get you every dollar you’re owed.
Under federal law, the standard is a “reasonable number of repair attempts.” While many states define this as three or four attempts, the federal act is more flexible, allowing a claim if the vehicle has been out of service for a cumulative total that effectively denies you the benefit of your warranty. This is particularly useful for used or certified pre-owned (CPO) vehicles that still possess an active manufacturer’s warranty but might not qualify under strict state-level “new car” statutes. Understanding how to file a lemon law claim is essential for tracking these repair attempts accurately. Here are examples of the kinds of issues that frequently qualify:
These are often taken most seriously by manufacturers and courts:
These problems affect the vehicle’s basic function or reliability:
While not safety issues, these defects can still qualify under state and federal warranty law:
Even if the defect isn’t life-threatening, if you’ve been back to the shop multiple times for the same problem or have experienced lengthy repair delays, you may still qualify—especially under federal laws like the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, which are broader than state lemon laws. Not sure if your issue qualifies? Let us review your repair records for free and give you a straight answer—fast, confidential, and with no obligation.
When it comes to lemon law and vehicle warranty claims, misinformation is everywhere. Many frustrated car owners don’t pursue their rights simply because they’ve been told—often by dealerships or internet rumors—that they don’t qualify, that it’s too late, or that filing a claim will void their warranty. The truth? You may have more rights than you think. At Kahn & Associates, we’ve helped thousands of consumers across the country get compensation or replacement vehicles by cutting through the confusion and applying federal warranty laws strategically. Here are some of the most common myths we hear—and the real facts you should know before giving up on your case:
| Myth | Fact |
| “My car has to be completely undriveable to qualify.” | False. Many qualifying defects affect usability, value, or safety—even if the car still runs. Think repeated transmission issues, electrical failures, or AC problems among others. |
| “My warranty is expired, so I’m out of luck.” | Not necessarily. If your problems occurred while the vehicle was still under warranty, you may still qualify for compensation under federal law—even if the warranty has since expired. |
| “I have to sue the dealership to get help.” | Wrong. Lemon law claims are made against the manufacturer, not the dealership. The dealer may do repairs, but legal responsibility lies with the automaker. |
| “I have to pay legal fees to bring a case.” | Nope. Most lemon law firms—including ours—work on a contingency basis. And if we win, the manufacturer pays your legal fees. |
| “Filing a lemon law claim will void my warranty.” | Absolutely not. It’s illegal for a manufacturer to void your warranty because you exercised your legal rights under federal law. |
| “I’ve only had one or two repairs—it’s too soon to act.” | Not true. One serious defect or multiple minor ones may qualify. We’ll help you figure it out. |
Don’t let myths keep you from getting what you’re owed. If you’re dealing with recurring vehicle issues, get a free case review and find out where you really stand.
Federal lemon law (the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act) works alongside your state’s consumer protection laws. Most lemon law claims involve both state and federal protections, and your attorney will pursue whichever combination gives you the strongest case. Learn about lemon law rights in your state:
Have questions about how federal and state laws work together? Visit our Frequently Asked Lemon Law Questions page or explore our complete lemon law overview for state-by-state comparisons.
No. Your vehicle doesn’t have to stop running entirely. If you’re dealing with repeated issues that affect the use, value, or safety of your vehicle—even if it still drives—you may qualify under federal warranty laws.
Most claims must be brought within 4 years of the breach or failure to fix the defect.
Yes, if the vehicle came with a manufacturer’s warranty or manufacturer’s extended warranty, and the problems occurred during the warranty period, you may still qualify under federal law.
Generally, 2–3 attempts for the same issue or an extended time out of service can qualify. There is no hard rule—what’s considered “reasonable” depends on the issue and circumstances.
If we win or settle your case, the manufacturer is required to pay your legal fees and costs. That means you pay nothing out of pocket—and we only get paid if we recover compensation for you.
Not usually. Most lemon law and warranty cases are resolved through direct negotiation with the manufacturer, without ever setting foot in a courtroom.
Yes. Federal warranty laws are flexible, and even a couple of repair attempts may be enough depending on the nature of the problem. Let us review your records and tell you for sure.
We’ve made the process as simple and stress-free as possible. Here’s what to expect:
You start by submitting basic info about your vehicle and repair history. It’s fast, confidential, and completely free. If we believe you have a case, we’ll move quickly to get things started—no office visit or upfront cost required.
The first thing the manufacturer wants is paperwork. We’ll need:
If you don’t have all the records, don’t worry—we’ll help you request them from the dealership or service center.
Once we have the necessary documents, our team:
Most cases settle without the need for a lawsuit and without going to court. If your matter does not settle out-of-court, we will discuss filing a lawsuit on your behalf under a separate engagement letter, at the Firm’s sole and absolute discretion.
If successful, you could receive:
There’s No Risk to You We work on a contingency basis, which means we only get paid if you do. If we don’t win, you owe nothing.
If you’re driving a lemon, don’t wait. Time limits apply, and the sooner you act, the better your chances.
If you’re dealing with repeated vehicle problems, take the first step now. Call our FREE “60 Second Lemon Law Assessment™” Hotline at 1-888-LEMONS-1 to speak directly with an experienced lemon law advocate. Once we have the basic information, we’ll evaluate your case in 60 seconds or less. Prefer online? Fill out our short “60 Second Lemon Law Assessment™” form, and one of our knowledgeable team members will reach out promptly.
You’ll never pay out of pocket. And if we don’t win, you owe us nothing. At Kahn & Associates, there’s no cost and no obligation—just clear answers and real help from a firm with decades of success standing up to car manufacturers. P.S. Even if you don’t hire us, the information we share could save you thousands and help you make informed decisions about your rights.
Attorney Craig Kahn founded the law firm of Kahn & Associates, LLC in 1996 with a commitment to providing high-quality and affordable legal services to individuals who have purchased a defective motor vehicle. With a proven track record, including a landmark Ohio Supreme Court case victory, the Firm has diligently and successfully defended the rights of consumers for well over a quarter century.
(1) The term “consumer product” means any tangible personal property which is distributed in commerce and which is normally used for personal, family, or household purposes (including any such property intended to be attached to or installed in any real property without regard to whether it is so attached or installed). (2) The term “Commission” means the Federal Trade Commission. (3) The term “consumer” means a buyer (other than for purposes of resale) of any consumer product, any person to whom such product is transferred during the duration of an implied or written warranty (or service contract) applicable to the product, and any other person who is entitled by the terms of such warranty (or service contract) or under applicable State law to enforce against the warrantor (or service contractor) the obligations of the warranty (or service contract). (4) The term “supplier” means any person engaged in the business of making a consumer product directly or indirectly available to consumers. (5) The term “warrantor” means any supplier or other person who gives or offers to give a written warranty or who is or may be obligated under an implied warranty.
(A) any written affirmation of fact or written promise made in connection with the sale of a consumer product by a supplier to a buyer which relates to the nature of the material or workmanship and affirms or promises that such material or workmanship is defect free or will meet a specified level of performance over a specified period of time, or
(B) any undertaking in writing in connection with the sale by a supplier of a consumer product to refund, repair, replace, or take other remedial action with respect to such product in the event that such product fails to meet the specifications set forth in the undertaking, which written affirmation, promise, or undertaking becomes part of the basis of the bargain between a supplier and a buyer for purposes other than resale of such product.
(7) The term “implied warranty” means an implied warranty arising under State law (as modified by sections 2308 and 2304(a) of this title) in connection with the sale by a supplier of a consumer product. (8) The term “service contract” means a contract in writing to perform, over a fixed period of time or for a specified duration, services relating to the maintenance or repair (or both) of a consumer product. (9) The term “reasonable and necessary maintenance” consists of those operations
(A) which the consumer reasonably can be expected to perform or have performed and
(B) which are necessary to keep any consumer product performing its intended function and operating at a reasonable level of performance.
(10) The term “remedy” means whichever of the following actions the warrantor elects:
(A) repair,
(B) replacement, or
(C) refund;
except that the warrantor may not elect refund unless (i) the warrantor is unable to provide replacement and repair is not commercially practicable or cannot be timely made, or (ii) the consumer is willing to accept such refund. (11) The term ”replacement” means furnishing a new consumer product which is identical or reasonably equivalent to the warranted consumer product. (12) The term “refund” means refunding the actual purchase price (less reasonable depreciation based on actual use where permitted by rules of the Commission). (13) The term “distributed in commerce” means sold in commerce, introduced or delivered for introduction into commerce, or held for sale or distribution after introduction into commerce. (14) The term “commerce” means trade, traffic, commerce, or transportation –
(A) between a place in a State and any place outside thereof, or
(B) which affects trade, traffic, commerce, or transportation described in subparagraph (A).
(15) The term “State” means a State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, the Canal Zone, or American Samoa. The term “State law” includes a law of the United States applicable only to the District of Columbia or only to a territory or possession of the United States; and the term “Federal law’” excludes any State law.
(a) Full and conspicuous disclosure of terms and conditions; additional requirements for contents In order to improve the adequacy of information available to consumers, prevent deception, and improve competition in the marketing of consumer products, any warrantor warranting a consumer product to a consumer by means of a written warranty shall, to the extent required by rules of the Commission, fully and conspicuously disclose in simple and readily understood language the terms and conditions of such warranty. Such rules may require inclusion in the written warranty of any of the following items among others:
(1) The clear identification of the names and addresses of the warrantors.
(2) The identity of the party or parties to whom the warranty is extended.
(3) The products or parts covered.
(4) A statement of what the warrantor will do in the event of a defect, malfunction, or failure to conform with such written warranty – at whose expense – and for what period of time.
(5) A statement of what the consumer must do and expenses he must bear.
(6) Exceptions and exclusions from the terms of the warranty.
(7) The step-by-step procedure which the consumer should take in order to obtain performance of any obligation under the warranty, including the identification of any person or class of persons authorized to perform the obligations set forth in the warranty.
(8) Information respecting the availability of any informal dispute settlement procedure offered by the warrantor and a recital, where the warranty so provides, that the purchaser may be required to resort to such procedure before pursuing any legal remedies in the courts.
(9) A brief, general description of the legal remedies available to the consumer.
(10) The time at which the warrantor will perform any obligations under the warranty.
(11) The period of time within which, after notice of a defect, malfunction, or failure to conform with the warranty, the warrantor will perform any obligations under the warranty.
(12) The characteristics or properties of the products, or parts thereof, that are not covered by the warranty.
(13) The elements of the warranty in words or phrases which would not mislead a reasonable, average consumer as to the nature or scope of the warranty.
(b) Availability of terms to consumer; manner and form for presentation and display of information; duration; extension of period for written warranty or service contract
(1) (A) The Commission shall prescribe rules requiring that the terms of any written warranty on a consumer product be made available to the consumer (or prospective consumer) prior to the sale of the product to him.
(B) The Commission may prescribe rules for determining the manner and form in which information with respect to any written warranty of a consumer product shall be clearly and conspicuously presented or displayed so as not to mislead the reasonable, average consumer, when such information is contained in advertising, labeling, point-of-sale material, or other representations in writing.
(2) Nothing in this chapter (other than paragraph (3) of this subsection) shall be deemed to authorize the Commission to prescribe the duration of written warranties given or to require that a consumer product or any of its components be warranted. (3) The Commission may prescribe rules for extending the period of time a written warranty or service contract is in effect to correspond with any period of time in excess of a reasonable period (not less than 10 days) during which the consumer is deprived of the use of such consumer product by reason of failure of the product to conform with the written warranty or by reason of the failure of the warrantor (or service contractor) to carry out such warranty (or service contract) within the period specified in the warranty (or service contract). (c) Prohibition on conditions for written or implied warranty; waiver by Commission No warrantor of a consumer product may condition his written or implied warranty of such product on the consumer’s using, in connection with such product, any article or service (other than article or service provided without charge under the terms of the warranty) which is identified by brand, trade, or corporate name; except that the prohibition of this subsection may be waived by the Commission if –
(1) the warrantor satisfies the Commission that the warranted product will function properly only if the article or service so identified is used in connection with the warranted product, and
(2) the Commission finds that such a waiver is in the public interest. The Commission shall identify in the Federal Register, and permit public comment on, all applications for waiver of the prohibition of this subsection, and shall publish in the Federal Register its disposition of any such application, including the reasons therefor.
(d) Incorporation by reference of detailed substantive warranty provisions The Commission may by rule devise detailed substantive warranty provisions which warrantors may incorporate by reference in their warranties. (e) Applicability to consumer products costing more than $5 The provisions of this section apply only to warranties which pertain to consumer products actually costing the consumer more than $5.
(a) Full (statement of duration) or limited warranty Any warrantor warranting a consumer product by means of a written warranty shall clearly and conspicuously designate such warranty in the following manner, unless exempted from doing so by the Commission pursuant to subsection (c) of this section:
(1) If the written warranty meets the Federal minimum standards for warranty set forth in section 2304 of this title, then it shall be conspicuously designated a ”full (statement of duration) warranty”.
(2) If the written warranty does not meet the Federal minimum standards for warranty set forth in section 2304 of this title, then it shall be conspicuously designated a “limited warranty”.
(b) Applicability of requirements, standards, etc., to representations or statements of customer satisfaction This section and sections 2302 and 2304 of this title shall not apply to statements or representations which are similar to expressions of general policy concerning customer satisfaction and which are not subject to any specific limitations. (c) Exemptions by Commission In addition to exercising the authority pertaining to disclosure granted in section 2302 of this title, the Commission may by rule determine when a written warranty does not have to be designated either ”full (statement of duration)” or ”limited” in accordance with this section. (d) Applicability to consumer products costing more than $10 and not designated as full warranties The provisions of subsections (a) and (c) of this section apply only to warranties which pertain to consumer products actually costing the consumer more than $10 and which are not designated “full (statement of duration) warranties”.
(a) Remedies under written warranty; duration of implied warranty; exclusion or limitation on consequential damages for breach of written or implied warranty; election of refund or replacement. In order for a warrantor warranting a consumer product by means of a written warranty to meet the Federal minimum standards for warranty –
(1) such warrantor must as a minimum remedy such consumer product within a reasonable time and without charge, in the case of a defect, malfunction, or failure to conform with such written warranty;
(2) notwithstanding section 2308(b) of this title, such warrantor may not impose any limitation on the duration of any implied warranty on the product;
(3) such warrantor may not exclude or limit consequential damages for breach of any written or implied warranty on such product, unless such exclusion or limitation conspicuously appears on the face of the warranty; and
(4) if the product (or a component part thereof) contains a defect or malfunction after a reasonable number of attempts by the warrantor to remedy defects or malfunctions in such product, such warrantor must permit the consumer to elect either a refund for, or replacement without charge of, such product or part (as the case may be). The Commission may by rule specify for purposes of this paragraph, what constitutes a reasonable number of attempts to remedy particular kinds of defects or malfunctions under different circumstances. If the warrantor replaces a component part of a consumer product, such replacement shall include installing the part in the product without charge.
(b) Duties and conditions imposed on consumer by warrantor
(1) In fulfilling the duties under subsection (a) of this section respecting a written warranty, the warrantor shall not impose any duty other than notification upon any consumer as a condition of securing remedy of any consumer product which malfunctions, is defective, or does not conform to the written warranty, unless the warrantor has demonstrated in a rulemaking proceeding, or can demonstrate in an administrative or judicial enforcement proceeding (including private enforcement), or in an informal dispute settlement proceeding, that such a duty is reasonable.
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a warrantor may require, as a condition to replacement of, or refund for, any consumer product under subsection (a) of this section, that such consumer product shall be made available to the warrantor free and clear of liens and other encumbrances, except as otherwise provided by rule or order of the Commission in cases in which such a requirement would not be practicable.
(3) The Commission may, by rule define in detail the duties set forth in subsection (a) of this section and the applicability of such duties to warrantors of different categories of consumer products with ”full (statement of duration)” warranties.
(4) The duties under subsection (a) of this section extend from the warrantor to each person who is a consumer with respect to the consumer product.
(c) Waiver of standards The performance of the duties under subsection (a) of this section shall not be required of the warrantor if he can show that the defect, malfunction, or failure of any warranted consumer product to conform with a written warranty, was caused by damage (not resulting from defect or malfunction) while in the possession of the consumer, or unreasonable use (including failure to provide reasonable and necessary maintenance). (d) Remedy without charge For purposes of this section and of section 2302(c) of this title, the term ”without charge” means that the warrantor may not assess the consumer for any costs the warrantor or his representatives incur in connection with the required remedy of a warranted consumer product. An obligation under subsection (a)(1)(A) of this section to remedy without charge does not necessarily require the warrantor to compensate the consumer for incidental expenses; however, if any incidental expenses are incurred because the remedy is not made within a reasonable time or because the warrantor imposed an unreasonable duty upon the consumer as a condition of securing remedy, then the consumer shall be entitled to recover reasonable incidental expenses which are so incurred in any action against the warrantor. (e) Incorporation of standards to products designated with full warranty for purposes of judicial actions If a supplier designates a warranty applicable to a consumer product as a ”full (statement of duration)” warranty, then the warranty on such product shall, for purposes of any action under section 2310(d) of this title or under any State law, be deemed to incorporate at least the minimum requirements of this section and rules prescribed under this section.
Nothing in this chapter shall prohibit the selling of a consumer product which has both full and limited warranties if such warranties are clearly and conspicuously differentiated.
(a) The Commission may prescribe by rule the manner and form in which the terms and conditions of service contracts shall be fully, clearly, and conspicuously disclosed. (b) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prevent a supplier or warrantor from entering into a service contract with the consumer in addition to or in lieu of a written warranty if such contract fully, clearly, and conspicuously discloses its terms and conditions in simple and readily understood language.
Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prevent any warrantor from designating representatives to perform duties under the written or implied warranty: Provided, That such warrantor shall make reasonable arrangements for compensation of such designated representatives, but no such designation shall relieve the warrantor of his direct responsibilities to the consumer or make the representative a co-warrantor.
(a) Restrictions on disclaimers or modifications No supplier may disclaim or modify (except as provided in subsection (b) of this section) any implied warranty to a consumer with respect to such consumer product if
(1) such supplier makes any written warranty to the consumer with respect to such consumer Product, or
(2) at the time of sale, or within 90 days thereafter, such supplier enters into a service contract with the consumer which applies to such consumer product.
(b) Limitation on duration For purposes of this chapter (other than section 2304(a)(2) of this title), implied warranties may be limited in duration to the duration of a written warranty of reasonable duration, if such limitation is conscionable and is set forth in clear and unmistakable language and prominently displayed on the face of the warranty. (c) Effectiveness of disclaimers, modifications, or limitations A disclaimer, modification, or limitation made in violation of this section shall be ineffective for purposes of this chapter and State law.
(a) Oral presentation Any rule prescribed under this chapter shall be prescribed in accordance with section 553 of title 5; except that the Commission shall give interested persons an opportunity for oral presentations of data, views, and arguments, in addition to written submissions. A transcript shall be kept of any oral presentation. Any such rule shall be subject to judicial review under section 57a(e) of this title in the same manner as rules prescribed under section 57a(a)(1)(B) of this title, except that section 57a(e)(3)(B) of this title shall not apply. (b) Warranties and warranty practices involved in sale of used motor vehicles The Commission shall initiate within one year after January 4, 1975, a rulemaking proceeding dealing with warranties and warranty practices in connection with the sale of used motor vehicles; and, to the extent necessary to supplement the protections offered the consumer by this chapter, shall prescribe rules dealing with such warranties and practices. In prescribing rules under this subsection, the Commission may exercise any authority it may have under this chapter, or other law, and in addition it may require disclosure that a used motor vehicle is sold without any warranty and specify the form and content of such disclosure.
(a) Informal dispute settlement procedures; establishment; rules setting forth minimum requirements; effect of compliance by warrantor; review of informal procedures or implementation by Commission; application to existing informal procedures (1) Congress hereby declares it to be its policy to encourage warrantors to establish procedures whereby consumer disputes are fairly and expeditiously settled through informal dispute settlement mechanisms. (2) The Commission shall prescribe rules setting forth minimum requirements for any informal dispute settlement procedure which is incorporated into the terms of a written warranty to which any provision of this chapter applies. Such rules shall provide for participation in such procedure by independent or governmental entities. (3) One or more warrantors may establish an informal dispute settlement procedure which meets the requirements of the Commission’s rules under paragraph (2). If –
(A) a warrantor establishes such a procedure,
(B) such procedure, and its implementation, meets the requirements of such rules, and
(C) he incorporates in a written warranty a requirement that the consumer resort to such procedure before pursuing any legal remedy under this section respecting such warranty, then
(i) the consumer may not commence a civil action (other than a class action) under subsection (d) of this section unless he initially resorts to such procedure; and
(ii) a class of consumers may not proceed in a class action under subsection (d) of this section except to the extent the court determines necessary to establish the representative capacity of the named plaintiffs, unless the named plaintiffs (upon notifying the defendant that they are named plaintiffs in a class action with respect to a warranty obligation) initially resort to such procedure. In the case of such a class action which is brought in a district court of the United States, the representative capacity of the named plaintiffs shall be established in the application of rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In any civil action arising out of a warranty obligation and relating to a matter considered in such a procedure, any decision in such procedure shall be admissible in evidence.
(4) The Commission on its own initiative may, or upon written complaint filed by any interested person shall, review the bona fide operation of any dispute settlement procedure resort to which is stated in a written warranty to be a prerequisite to pursuing a legal remedy under this section. If the Commission finds that such procedure or its implementation fails to comply with the requirements of the rules under paragraph (2), the Commission may take appropriate remedial action under any authority it may have under this chapter or any other provision of law. (5) Until rules under paragraph (2) take effect, this subsection shall not affect the validity of any informal dispute settlement procedure respecting consumer warranties, but in any action under subsection (d) of this section, the court may invalidate any such procedure if it finds that such procedure is unfair. (b) Prohibited acts It shall be a violation of section 45(a)(1) of this title for any person to fail to comply with any requirement imposed on such person by this chapter (or a rule thereunder) or to violate any prohibition contained in this chapter (or a rule thereunder). (c) Injunction proceedings by Attorney General or Commission for deceptive warranty, noncompliance with requirements, or violating prohibitions; procedures; definitions (1) The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction of any action brought by the Attorney General (in his capacity as such), or by the Commission by any of its attorneys designated by it for such purpose, to restrain
(A) any warrantor from making a deceptive warranty with respect to a consumer product, or
(B) any person from failing to comply with any requirement imposed on such person by or pursuant to this chapter or from violating any prohibition contained in this chapter. Upon proper showing that, weighing the equities and considering the Commission’s or Attorney General’s likelihood of ultimate success, such action would be in the public interest and after notice to the defendant, a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction may be granted without bond. In the case of an action brought by the Commission, if a complaint under section 45 of this title is not filed within such period (not exceeding 10 days) as may be specified by the court after the issuance of the temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, the order or injunction shall be dissolved by the court and be of no further force and effect. Any suit shall be brought in the district in which such person resides or transacts business. Whenever it appears to the court that the ends of justice require that other persons should be parties in the action, the court may cause them to be summoned whether or not they reside in the district in which the court is held, and to that end process may be served in any district.
(2) For the purposes of this subsection, the term ”deceptive warranty” means
(A) a written warranty which (i) contains an affirmation, promise, description, or representation which is either false or fraudulent, or which, in light of all of the circumstances, would mislead a reasonable individual exercising due care; or (ii) fails to contain information which is necessary in light of all of the circumstances, to make the warranty not misleading to a reasonable individual exercising due care; or
(B) a written warranty created by the use of such terms as ”guaranty” or ”warranty”, if the terms and conditions of such warranty so limit its scope and application as to deceive a reasonable individual.
(d) Civil action by consumer for damages, etc.; jurisdiction; recovery of costs and expenses; cognizable claims (1) Subject to subsections (a)(3) and (e) of this section, a consumer who is damaged by the failure of a supplier, warrantor, or service contractor to comply with any obligation under this chapter, or under a written warranty, implied warranty, or service contract, may bring suit for damages and other legal and equitable relief – (A) in any court of competent jurisdiction in any State or the District of Columbia; or (B) in an appropriate district court of the United States, subject to paragraph (3) of this subsection. (2) If a consumer finally prevails in any action brought under paragraph (1) of this subsection, he may be allowed by the court to recover as part of the judgment a sum equal to the aggregate amount of cost and expenses (including attorneys’ fees based on actual time expended) determined by the court to have been reasonably incurred by the plaintiff for or in connection with the commencement and prosecution of such action, unless the court in its discretion shall determine that such an award of attorneys’ fees would be inappropriate. (3) No claim shall be cognizable in a suit brought under paragraph (1)(B) of this subsection –
(A) if the amount in controversy of any individual claim is less than the sum or value of $25;
(B) if the amount in controversy is less than the sum or value of $50,000 (exclusive of interests and costs) computed on the basis of all claims to be determined in this suit; or
(C) if the action is brought as a class action, and the number of named plaintiffs is less than one hundred.
(e) Class actions; conditions; procedures applicable No action (other than a class action or an action respecting a warranty to which subsection (a)(3) of this section applies) may be brought under subsection (d) of this section for failure to comply with any obligation under any written or implied warranty or service contract, and a class of consumers may not proceed in a class action under such subsection with respect to such a failure except to the extent the court determines necessary to establish the representative capacity of the named plaintiffs, unless the person obligated under the warranty or service contract is afforded a reasonable opportunity to cure such failure to comply. In the case of such a class action (other than a class action respecting a warranty to which subsection (a)(3) of this section applies) brought under subsection (d) of this section for breach of any written or implied warranty or service contract, such reasonable opportunity will be afforded by the named plaintiffs and they shall at that time notify the defendant that they are acting on behalf of the class. In the case of such a class action which is brought in a district court of the United States, the representative capacity of the named plaintiffs shall be established in the application of rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (f) Warrantors subject to enforcement of remedies For purposes of this section, only the warrantor actually making a written affirmation of fact, promise, or undertaking shall be deemed to have created a written warranty, and any rights arising thereunder may be enforced under this section only against such warrantor and no other person.
(a) Federal Trade Commission Act and Federal Seed Act
(1) Nothing contained in this chapter shall be construed to repeal, invalidate, or supersede the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) or any statute defined therein as an Antitrust Act.
(2) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to repeal, invalidate, or supersede the Federal Seed Act (7 U.S.C. 1551 et seq.) and nothing in this chapter shall apply to seed for planting.
(b) Rights, remedies, and liabilities
(1) Nothing in this chapter shall invalidate or restrict any right or remedy of any consumer under State law or any other Federal law.
(2) Nothing in this chapter (other than sections 2308 and 2304(a)(2) and (4) of this title) shall (A) affect the liability of, or impose liability on, any person for personal injury, or (B) supersede any provision of State law regarding consequential damages for injury to the person or other injury.
(c) State warranty laws (1) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section and in paragraph (2) of this subsection, a State requirement –
(A) which relates to labeling or disclosure with respect to written warranties or performance thereunder;
(B) which is within the scope of an applicable requirement of sections 2302, 2303, and 2304 of this title (and rules implementing such sections), and
(C) which is not identical to a requirement of section 2302, 2303, or 2304 of this title (or a rule thereunder), shall not be applicable to written warranties complying with such sections (or rules thereunder).
(2) If, upon application of an appropriate State agency, the Commission determines (pursuant to rules issued in accordance with section 2309 of this title) that any requirement of such State covering any transaction to which this chapter applies
(A) affords protection to consumers greater than the requirements of this chapter and
(B) does not unduly burden interstate commerce, then such State requirement shall be applicable (notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (1) of this subsection) to the extent specified in such determination for so long as the State administers and enforces effectively any such greater requirement.
(d) Other Federal warranty laws This chapter (other than section 2302(c) of this title) shall be inapplicable to any written warranty the making or content of which is otherwise governed by Federal law. If only a portion of a written warranty is so governed by Federal law, the remaining portion shall be subject to this chapter.
(a) Effective date of chapter Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, this chapter shall take effect 6 months after January 4, 1975, but shall not apply to consumer products manufactured prior to such date. (b) Effective date of section 2302(a) Section 2302(a) of this title shall take effect 6 months after the final publication of rules respecting such section; except that the Commission, for good cause shown, may postpone the applicability of such sections until one year after such final publication in order to permit any designated classes of suppliers to bring their written warranties into compliance with rules promulgated pursuant to this chapter. (c) Promulgation of rules The Commission shall promulgate rules for initial implementation of this chapter as soon as possible after January 4, 1975, but in no event later than one year after such date.
Client Reviews
2 weeks 
Was getting nowhere on a brand new car issue. Manufacturer was unable to correct problem and local attorneys admitted they were not experienced in Lemon Law cases. Reached out to Kahn from website and got an immediate response. Was concerned at the time they were in Ohio and I was in NC. Those fears went away with the help of Vicky Eck and Daniel Scharville. Always got returned phone calls, questions answered and firm action taken. These are the folks to go to with Lemon Law issues. My wife and I were very satisfied with results.
View More Reviews on Google Maps
This page has been written, edited, and reviewed by a team of legal writers following our comprehensive editorial guidelines. This page was approved by Attorney Craig A. Kahn, who has more than 20 years of legal experience in lemon law.
To see if you qualify, fill out the form below or call us at 1-888-536-6671 – No Office Visit Needed!
The Truth About Attorney’s Fees in Lemon Law Cases Learn more
Message Us 
Call Us