60 Second Lemon Law Assessment™
by Kahn & Associates - August 6th, 2026
A new vehicle should make life easier, not turn every week into another trip to the service department. If repeated repairs have not fixed a serious problem, the Pennsylvania Lemon Law may give Pittsburgh and Philadelphia drivers important rights against the manufacturer. The details matter: the vehicle, the warranty, the repair history, the timing, and the paperwork you keep can all affect a claim.
For nearly three decades, as of the date of this article, we have represented consumers in manufacturer-warranty cases and have recovered more than $65 million for clients. Most of our cases resolve without a lawsuit. If your vehicle has been in for repair for the same issue at least twice, or has been or will be out of service for at least 21 calendar days, start with our 60-Second Lemon Law Assessment or call 1-888-536-6671. There are no out-of-pocket fees or costs to you, win or lose.
Pennsylvania’s Automobile Lemon Law, found at 73 P.S. §1951 and following, was written to protect purchasers and lessees of certain passenger vehicles. To be covered, the vehicle generally must be purchased or leased in Pennsylvania, used for personal, family, or household purposes, and covered by a manufacturer’s express warranty. The problem must be a defect, known in the statute as a nonconformity, that substantially impairs the vehicle’s use, value, or safety.
The statute is written around a new motor vehicle, but that term is broader than it sounds. It reaches a vehicle used by a manufacturer or dealer as a demonstrator or dealer car before sale, and since an amendment effective in May 2025 it reaches motorcycles as well.
For many drivers in Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, and elsewhere in Pennsylvania, the first questions are practical:
A warning light, stalling, braking concern, electrical failure, transmission issue, steering problem, or other defect may be more than an inconvenience when repairs do not resolve it. Do not rely on memory alone. Keep every repair order, invoice, appointment record, tow receipt, and communication. Those documents can show both the defect and the opportunity the manufacturer had to repair it. If you are unsure whether your situation fits the statute, a case review can give you a clear answer, and you do not need your paperwork organized first.
Under the Pennsylvania Lemon Law, a manufacturer must be given a reasonable opportunity to repair a nonconformity before you can pursue a remedy. The statute creates an important legal presumption during the first year after delivery, the first 12,000 miles, or the warranty period, whichever comes first. Under 73 P.S. §1956, a reasonable number of repair attempts is presumed when the same nonconformity has been subject to repair three or more times and continues to exist, or when the vehicle has been out of service because of repair for a cumulative total of 30 or more calendar days.
A case does not automatically fail simply because someone counts the visits differently. The repair records must be read carefully. Several visits can involve one continuing defect even if the service department uses different wording each time. Likewise, the number of days out of service may depend on the actual dates the vehicle was unavailable for covered repair. A clear, chronological repair file can help show both the count of attempts and the total time out of service.
The federal standard is more forgiving on this point. The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act sets no fixed count. It asks whether the manufacturer had a reasonable number of attempts, judged on the facts, including how serious the defect is and how long the vehicle has been unavailable. A repair history that falls short of Pennsylvania’s three-attempt or thirty-day presumption can still support a federal claim, which is why we evaluate both.
You also do not need to reach those numbers before asking. Two visits for the same issue, or 21 calendar days out of service, is enough to have the record reviewed by us.
Pennsylvania does not impose the kind of pre-suit written notice and final-repair step that several other states require before the presumption applies. What matters here is the record. Document every report of the problem, every appointment, and every repair attempt, and keep your own written summary of each visit and the symptoms you described.
When the manufacturer cannot repair a qualifying vehicle after a reasonable number of attempts, the available remedy may include a replacement vehicle or a refund. The statute allows the consumer to return the vehicle and get a replacement of comparable value, or a refund the purchase price plus collateral charges, with an allowance for use deducted. The outstanding loan is paid off as part of a repurchase: the statute directs that refunds be made to the purchaser and the lien holder, if any, as their interests appear, so the financing is retired rather than left for you to carry into your next vehicle. The right remedy depends on the facts, the vehicle transaction, and the applicable law. In some situations, a negotiated resolution may provide monetary compensation or another outcome tailored to the client’s circumstances.
There can be a mileage deduction in a Pennsylvania repurchase or replacement calculation, and Pennsylvania’s rule is not the same as the rule in every other state. The mileage offset is the lesser of 10 cents per mile at the first repair attempt or 10 percent of the purchase price. The date and mileage recorded on the first repair order therefore matter. Preserve that first repair order, even when the defect seemed minor at the time, because it may be the moment the mileage deduction is measured.
The fee provision is mandatory rather than discretionary. Under 73 P.S. §1958, a purchaser who suffers a loss from the manufacturer’s failure to comply may bring a civil action and shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees and all court costs. That is stronger than the federal act, which provides only that a court may award fees. In negotiated settlements that resolve a case before trial, the parties often agree on manufacturer-paid attorney fees as part of the total recovery, which is different from suggesting a court has already awarded them. We review the paperwork with the goal of holding the manufacturer accountable under the warranty and the law, and you are not required to pay us any out-of-pocket fees or costs, win or lose.
| Aspect | Pennsylvania Automobile Lemon Law |
| Coverage window | 12 months or 12,000 miles, or the warranty period, whichever comes first |
| Presumed reasonable attempts | 3 or more repair attempts for the same nonconformity, or 30 or more cumulative days out of service |
| Mileage offset | Lesser of 10 cents per mile at first repair or 10% of the purchase price |
| Filing deadline | None set in the Lemon Law itself; courts apply other limitations periods |
| Remedies for a prevailing consumer | Replacement vehicle, or refund of the purchase price and collateral charges with the loan paid off, less the use allowance; reasonable attorney fees and costs are recoverable as well (§1958 uses “shall”) |
Drivers are sometimes told, by a dealership or an internet post, that a Pennsylvania lemon law claim must be brought within a very short period after the warranty ends. That is a misconception. The Pennsylvania Automobile Lemon Law itself does not contain a one-year-after-the-warranty filing deadline. The defect must arise within the coverage window, generally the first 12 months or 12,000 miles or during the warranty period, but that concerns when the problem must appear and be reported for repair, not how long you have to file a lawsuit afterward or make a claim.
Because lemon law claims are usually tied to a written warranty and the sale of goods, the four-year limitations period in Pennsylvania’s Uniform Commercial Code at 13 Pa. C.S. §2725 is generally understood to apply, and related claims under the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law carry a longer six-year period. Because the lemon law itself is silent, how these periods apply to a particular claim is a question worth putting to a lawyer rather than assuming. What is clear is that you are not boxed in by a one-year clock running from the warranty’s expiration, though acting sooner is rarely a mistake.
The practical deadline can also arrive sooner than you expect for other reasons. Every month you keep driving the vehicle and adding miles gives the manufacturer an argument that the defect is not substantially impairing its use, value, or safety. A vehicle driven for years after the repairs looks, to a manufacturer’s lawyer, like a vehicle that works. Waiting also makes proof harder. Repair records get lost, employees’ recollections fade, and a manufacturer may argue that a later complaint is unrelated to the original issue. If your vehicle is still being repaired, has already accumulated significant down time, or has had unsuccessful attempts for the same defect, now is the right time to have the record reviewed rather than waiting to see how the facts might change.
A vehicle may still support a manufacturer-warranty claim even if it does not fit every Pennsylvania Lemon Law requirement. Other laws, including the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and warranty protections under the Uniform Commercial Code, may apply depending on the vehicle and the facts. The federal warranty law does not impose the same state coverage limits, and it can reach vehicles and warranties a state statute does not.
Used vehicles are a common example. The state statute is written for new vehicles, but a used vehicle does not have to be under warranty today to support a federal claim. What matters is that repairs were performed under the manufacturer’s warranty or the manufacturer’s extended warranty. That does not mean every vehicle problem creates a claim, and our work is not focused on claims against dealers for sales-practice disputes or fraud. Our focus is breach of warranty and lemon law claims against manufacturers. A case review can identify the proper path without overstating what the Pennsylvania Lemon Law covers. You can also read our answers to common lemon law questions.
The legal standard is statewide, but the next steps look similar whether your service appointments are in Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, or another Pennsylvania community. Start a single file for the vehicle. Add each repair order in date order, note the odometer reading, keep photographs or video when helpful, and save texts and emails about appointments. Ask the service department to state the customer’s concern accurately on every repair order before you leave, and get a dated copy of the order each time the vehicle is dropped off and picked up.
Pittsburgh and Philadelphia drivers face the same coverage window and the same mileage-offset rule as everyone else in Pennsylvania, but the way a case is handled locally can differ. Dealerships in different regions may word the same recurring problem differently, which is why an accurate write-up matters. You do not need to travel to an office to get answers. We handle Pennsylvania lemon law matters remotely, so Pittsburgh and Philadelphia residents can begin by phone or online. That lets us focus on the repair history and the manufacturer’s warranty obligations rather than creating another burden for a driver already dealing with an unreliable vehicle.

A repair order is more than a receipt. It can establish when the problem was reported, the mileage on the vehicle, what the technician was asked to address, and whether the concern was corrected. If a dashboard warning appears intermittently, explain the symptoms in your own words and ask that the concern be included in the service write-up. If the vehicle is returned without a repair, keep that record too. A “no problem found” entry can still show that you brought the same issue to the authorized repair facility, which can count toward the repair-attempt and time-out-of-service tallies.
Before you leave the dealership, compare the repair order with what you reported. Dates, mileage, and the description of the defect should be accurate. For a Pittsburgh or Philadelphia driver with a long repair history, a clean chronological set of records makes it much easier to assess whether the Pennsylvania Lemon Law presumptions, a warranty claim, or both may apply. A small inconsistency on one order can create a dispute, so it is worth fixing the record at the counter before you drive away.

Continue to use the authorized repair process while the warranty remains in effect unless advised otherwise based on your individual circumstances. Avoid altering the vehicle in a way that may distract from the manufacturer’s repair obligation. A prompt case review can help you protect the evidence while the manufacturer still has a responsibility to address the defect, and help you avoid mistakes that complicate an otherwise strong claim.
There is no one-year-after-the-warranty deadline in the Pennsylvania Lemon Law. The four-year limitations period for warranty claims under the Uniform Commercial Code is generally understood to apply, and UTPCPL claims may allow up to six years. What matters most is that the defect arose within the first 12 months or 12,000 miles or during the warranty, and that you act while the record is still strong.
The Pennsylvania Automobile Lemon Law primarily protects purchasers and lessees of covered new passenger vehicles, motorcycles and demos. A used vehicle may still support a manufacturer-warranty claim under federal law, and it does not have to be under warranty today, so long as repairs were performed under the manufacturer’s warranty or extended warranty. Not every used vehicle problem creates a claim.
Yes. The Pennsylvania Automobile Lemon Law extends rights to lessees as well as purchasers of qualifying passenger vehicles. A lessee may be able to require a remedy against the manufacturer if a covered nonconformity is not repaired after a reasonable number of attempts. Keep the same records for a lease that you would keep for a purchase.
The 30 calendar days are the cumulative days the vehicle is out of service because repairs for a covered nonconformity. Keep the drop-off and pick-up dates on every repair order so you can add up the days accurately. Days the vehicle is simply in your possession do not count toward the total.
If a Pennsylvania lemon law case goes to a verdict and the consumer prevails, the statute provides for reasonable attorney fees and costs. If a case settles before trial, the parties often agree on manufacturer-paid attorney fees as part of the total recovery. The details depend on how the case ends. Either way, you are not required to pay us any out-of-pocket fees or costs, win or lose.
If you have reached the point of looking for a lemon law lawyer in Pittsburgh or Philadelphia, you have probably already spent months trying to get the vehicle fixed. You do not have to work out the legal questions on your own. We can review the warranty, the repair history, the records, and the mileage offset, then explain in plain terms what your options are and what each one is likely to produce.
Two repair visits for the same issue, or 21 calendar days out of service, is enough to find out where you stand. Get a no-cost case review through our 60-Second Lemon Law Assessment or call Kahn & Associates at 1-888-536-6671. We represent Pennsylvania consumers in claims against manufacturers, and there are no out-of-pocket fees or costs to you, win or lose.
*Disclaimer: The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as offering legal advice, or creating an attorney client relationship between the reader and the author. While we aim for accuracy, the law is constantly changing and we make no guarantees regarding the completeness or timeliness of the information. You should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in this Website without seeking appropriate legal advice about your individual facts and circumstances from an attorney licensed in your state.
This page has been written, edited, and reviewed by a team of legal writers following our comprehensive editorial guidelines. This page was approved by Attorney Craig A. Kahn, who has more than 20 years of legal experience in lemon law.
Pennsylvania gives new vehicle owners one of the tighter reporting windows in the country and one of the mo...
One of the first questions we hear from vehicle owners dealing with a defective car or truck is, "How much ...
If your new car keeps breaking down despite multiple trips to the dealership, you may be wondering how to f...
Stuck with a defective car in Ohio? State Lemon Laws protect you. Get a refund, replacement, or cash settlement. Learn your rights today!
Florida Lemon Laws cover new and used vehicles. If your car’s a lemon, you deserve compensation. Let us help you fight for justice!
Michigan’s Lemon Law protects you from faulty vehicles. Don’t settle for endless repairs—claim your refund or replacement now.
North Carolina Lemon Laws ensure defective vehicles are replaced or refunded. Know your rights and take action today!
Pennsylvania Lemon Law covers new cars with repeated issues. Get the compensation you deserve. Click to learn more!
To see if you qualify, fill out the form below or call us at 1-888-536-6671 – No Office Visit Needed!
The Truth About Attorney’s Fees in Lemon Law Cases Learn more
*Disclaimer: The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as offering legal advice, or creating an attorney client relationship between the reader and the author. While we aim for accuracy, the law is constantly changing and we make no guarantees regarding the completeness or timeliness of the information. You should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in this Website without seeking appropriate legal advice about your individual facts and circumstances from an attorney licensed in your state.